Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:56:49 09/13/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 13, 1999 at 14:44:54, Zachariah Amela wrote: >On September 13, 1999 at 14:12:51, ERIQ wrote: > >>thx, again Dr.hyatt, >> but I was afraid of that as I really distrust MS :( > >....oh but why? LOL! > >P.S. Dr. Hyatt. Which is faster/more stable a Linux compiled crafty or an MS >compiled crafty? Or does it matter? > >P.P.S. What would someone compile crafty under if the were running Solaris 7. >Not that I am, since it has possibly the worst installation on the face of the >planet. I know of people who will be installing it soon though. Win 98 doesn't seem to be a reliable platform... Win NT seems pretty good, although it has some interesting networking problems (ie it doesn't like big email messages or its local mail transport dies, etc.) But I haven't noticed any issues with crafty under linux or NT that are alarming. We have NT machines that stay up for weeks with no problems. We have linux boxes that stay up for weeks and months with no problems. We have some NT boxes that are simply problems (secretaries get big email messages, suddenly can't connect to the network, suddenly can't print, etc.) But those are not all that common... I think either can work well...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.