Author: James T. Walker
Date: 16:15:03 09/13/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 1999 at 20:54:47, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On September 12, 1999 at 10:43:37, Randy Schmidt wrote: > >>I do not believe that Crafty running on any processor(s) would >>be stronger than Hiarcs7.1, or for that matter Junior. My >>large caveat is that the time control be something like eight >>hours a move (perhaps even 50 hours a move). >> >>My point is that the positional elements of Junior and Hiarcs >>would supercede the speed of crafty on a souped up computer. >>On any time control faster than 40/2, I think Crafty would have >>a decisive advantage. >> > > >Here's a point to ponder. If "junior" has a lot more 'positional understanding' >than crafty, how would you explain the fact that it is _far_ faster than crafty. >In fact, it is likely the fastest program running that I have seen NPS numbers >for. ************** I believe Nimzo99 is just as fast if not slightly faster(NPS) and Fritz is definitely faster on both my PII and K6-3. My "Short Marks" for different programs on my K6-3: Nimzo 99 415Kn/s Junior 5.0 382Kn/s Fritz 5.32 470Kn/s Hiarcs 7.32 54Kn/s Jim Walker *************** > > >>I would love to see the experiment however, as would everyone else :) >> >>I would be remiss if I didn't state that Rebel 10b would be favored >>over crafty at LONG time controls, but not Fritz x.x > > >You might ask ed about this.. He has _already_ done this experiment. The >results are on the rebel message board. Read them, then take a few deep >breaths to recover, and come back for more discussion. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.