Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 16:52:14 09/13/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 13, 1999 at 19:13:54, Zachariah Amela wrote: > >>We are running solaris 7 (2.7) here. They _still_ can't seem to deliver a >>64 bit compiler for reasons unknown. Their professional C compiler is not >>bad, but they have _zero_ decent processors to choose from. IE they lose to >>Intel speed-wise in any ultrasparc configuration you can try, which is sad... > >Very sad indeed. What do you think of Solaris on the x86 platform? Seems kind >of interesting to me, since Sun processors are lagging behind the game BIG time. > With the PIII, the AMD K7 and Apple's G4, I would be scared in Sun land. > >How did Crafty compile under their C? > >P.S. What IS the deal w/ no compiler for the 64Bit? That is one of their big >bragging points, have 64Bits. > >Anywho, thanks. Nice chatting. Here's a big hint: there are 100X more Sparc boxes runing Linux, than there are X86 boxes running solaris. It is slow, cumbersome, bloated, buggy, etc...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.