Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 01:36:53 09/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 13, 1999 at 23:24:29, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On September 13, 1999 at 19:41:14, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>I've had similar experiences on ICC. I seem to be able to score more than my >>fair share of draws against the computer programs playing there. If I try to win >>I get "embarassed". But when I play to draw, the games I've been successful (5 3 >>blitz unrated) at have followed 1 of 2 patterns: >> >>1) One of the crafty clones has a penchant for unsound gambits (Englund gambit >>with f7-f6). I play solidly with a caro pawn structure and exchange down to an >>ending, which I draw. >>2) I play an exchange sac, which computer programs do not cope with as well as >>they should. They don't understand the importance of activating their rook. One >>game I almost won, but I screwed up and allowed counterplay and had to force a >>draw. >> >>I'm 2411 on ICC. My best score in one day was 2 draws out of 4 games if I >>remember correctly. I feel pretty sure these programs are easier to draw than >>GMs. > >Not to be Mr. Hormone Dude or anything, but I'd be happy to take you up on this >as well. If you want to play a match of perhaps 10 games of 5 0, let's set up a >time. If you want to play with increment, I'm less confident of the result, but >I'll do that as well. > >bruce It's definitely your hormones doing the talking. I made a GENERAL statement about computer programs in GENERAL. At no point did I single out your program. I made no claim concerning about state of the art programs on really fast hardware. I've coroborated what I've said in another post and I don't have to do any more than that. It's funny that you should take a general statement and react to it like it was an attack on the quality of your own program. Insecure maybe?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.