Author: Will Singleton
Date: 09:59:03 09/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 14, 1999 at 04:55:59, Jouni Uski wrote: >Is this really correct: Crafty bench (16.6 and 16.17 both) displays average >NPS 175000 for Celeron 300, but "only" 165000 for AMD 450. Is something wrong >or has somedody similar results? > >Jouni My results show the K6 outperforming the Celeron (I think!). Latest results for the TSCP nps test: Platform Compiler nps Dann's build P3/500 msvc opt 63,246 x K6-2/400 msvc opt 57,163 x Cel/450 msvc opt 56,075 K6-3/450 msvc opt 53,634 x P2/450 msvc opt 49,338 x K6-2/350 msvc opt 45,679 x Cel/400 msvc opt 45,072 x Mac G3/300 CW 3.1 opt 40,519 K6-2/300 pgcc -0 38,900 P2/300 msvc opt 38,223 x K6-2/266 msvc opt 38,159 K6-2/400 cygwin opt 37,516 K6-2/350 borland opt 32,638 K6-2/350 symantec opt 32,168 P2/300 gcc opt 29,205 K6-2/400 msvc no opt 28,745 Cyrix 300 msvc opt 25,345 x Mac 7300/180 CW 3.1 opt 24,441 K6-2/400 cygwin no opt 23,885 P6/200 msvc opt 23,581 x P5/180 msvc opt 21,624 x Cyrix 200 msvc opt 20,398 x K5/116 gcc -0 17,200 P6/200 watcom opt 16,018
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.