Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 10:44:57 09/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
I beleive TSCP fit entirely into L1 cache. For larger programs / programs with larger data sets, L2 speed becomes critical. And here K6/2 lags behind at 66Mhz, vs. full CPU speed for Celeron. Eugene On September 14, 1999 at 12:59:03, Will Singleton wrote: >On September 14, 1999 at 04:55:59, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>Is this really correct: Crafty bench (16.6 and 16.17 both) displays average >>NPS 175000 for Celeron 300, but "only" 165000 for AMD 450. Is something wrong >>or has somedody similar results? >> >>Jouni > >My results show the K6 outperforming the Celeron (I think!). > >Latest results for the TSCP nps test: > >Platform Compiler nps Dann's build > >P3/500 msvc opt 63,246 x >K6-2/400 msvc opt 57,163 x >Cel/450 msvc opt 56,075 >K6-3/450 msvc opt 53,634 x >P2/450 msvc opt 49,338 x >K6-2/350 msvc opt 45,679 x >Cel/400 msvc opt 45,072 x >Mac G3/300 CW 3.1 opt 40,519 >K6-2/300 pgcc -0 38,900 >P2/300 msvc opt 38,223 x >K6-2/266 msvc opt 38,159 >K6-2/400 cygwin opt 37,516 >K6-2/350 borland opt 32,638 >K6-2/350 symantec opt 32,168 >P2/300 gcc opt 29,205 >K6-2/400 msvc no opt 28,745 >Cyrix 300 msvc opt 25,345 x >Mac 7300/180 CW 3.1 opt 24,441 >K6-2/400 cygwin no opt 23,885 >P6/200 msvc opt 23,581 x >P5/180 msvc opt 21,624 x >Cyrix 200 msvc opt 20,398 x >K5/116 gcc -0 17,200 >P6/200 watcom opt 16,018
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.