Author: odell hall
Date: 11:27:19 09/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 14, 1999 at 10:10:07, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On September 14, 1999 at 01:45:21, odell hall wrote: > >>On September 13, 1999 at 22:11:25, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On September 13, 1999 at 20:01:23, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>> >>>>On September 13, 1999 at 19:50:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On September 13, 1999 at 19:41:14, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On September 13, 1999 at 19:08:22, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On September 13, 1999 at 19:06:01, Charles Unruh wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>GM's can draw 50% of games or more at 5 minutes vs comps if that is their goal >>>>>>>>i.e to draw. I say this because by taking said strategy i have been able to draw >>>>>>>>about 15-20% of my games against comps and i'm just recently an expert. >>>>>>>>Anti-computer play really pays the bills when doing this. Most progs seem to >>>>>>>>want draws anyway, especially Genius. Now this is a bit contrary to how one >>>>>>>>should play to get a draw vs humans, but we aren't talking about humans here :). >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I would be happy to take you up on this. Please email me if you want to arrange >>>>>>>a time, and we can do this on ICC. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Some GM's can do OK at 5 0, but there are a lot who will lose every game of a >>>>>>>ten-game match, I think. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>bruce >>>>>> >>>>>>I've had similar experiences on ICC. I seem to be able to score more than my >>>>>>fair share of draws against the computer programs playing there. If I try to win >>>>>>I get "embarassed". But when I play to draw, the games I've been successful (5 3 >>>>>>blitz unrated) at have followed 1 of 2 patterns: >>>>>> >>>>>>1) One of the crafty clones has a penchant for unsound gambits (Englund gambit >>>>>>with f7-f6). I play solidly with a caro pawn structure and exchange down to an >>>>>>ending, which I draw. >>>>>>2) I play an exchange sac, which computer programs do not cope with as well as >>>>>>they should. They don't understand the importance of activating their rook. One >>>>>>game I almost won, but I screwed up and allowed counterplay and had to force a >>>>>>draw. >>>>>> >>>>>>I'm 2411 on ICC. My best score in one day was 2 draws out of 4 games if I >>>>>>remember correctly. I feel pretty sure these programs are easier to draw than >>>>>>GMs. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I'm with Bruce here. at 5 0 draws are probably hopeless. with an increment, >>>>>the chances go up... but if you are expecting your opponent to play a bogus >>>>>opening and then draw it, look out. Not _all_ clones (and certainly not the >>>>>"real mccoy") play gambits... except for those that are reasonably sound, like >>>>>the Evans, etc... >>>>> >>>>>I'd be happy to let you try your luck with 'crafty' on ICC or FICS if you want, >>>>>as it is always interesting to see if I have problems I don't know of. But you >>>>>probably want to talk to IM Kim Commons or Brian Hartman, first. Kim >>>>>particularly plays for Draws vs Crafty and he is not real successful at doing >>>>>so at blitz time controls... >>>> >>>>Type "search slo-mo blackdragon" at ICC. I score +1 -2 =1. I failed to remember >>>>I had won a game when I wrote my previous post. If you go over the games, you >>>>will see how effective my solid approach is and how unlucky I was that I did not >>>>do better! I will try to figure out the names of some of the other comps I've >>>>played. One was a CSTAL account, but I can't remmeber the name of the handle. I >>>>thought all the games I played were 5 3, but I was mistaken. I've played faster >>>>time limits, apparently. >>> >>> >>>As I said, 'blackdragon' is unknown. It is an old version on slow hardware. >>>If you'd like to try the 'real mccoy' for a match, unrated, let me know. It can >>>be set up easily... >>> >>>If you aren't an IM, your chances of winning a blitz game are essentially zero. >>>At least a real crafty, on real hardware, with reasonable book, and not >>>intentionally weakened... It is _very_ difficult for IM players to beat it, >>>whether the game is standard where they have their best chances, or blitz where >>>it just doesn't lose many games vs GM players, and hardly any any vs IM >>>players... >>> >>>But it is an easy hypothesis to test if you'd like... >> >> >>Try your crafty against Alexander Morovich A-moro(icc) I bet crafty would have >>his hands full or get spanked, I am speaking of Standard time Game in 15 > > >Do you think he is substantially better than (a) Yasser Seirawan (b) Gata Kamsky >(c) Walter Browne (d) most other GMs there? IE Shirov, etc? Game in 15 won't >cut it for GM players. I have played dozens of such games and can't recall >losing any. Game/30 gets a little more interesting, but I haven't seen Crafty >lose many of those (it also doesn't play many of those except against GMs that >ask to play it as guest to try something different in an opening.) > >If you know him and want to ask him to play a match, I'm game. I have matched >him a couple of times and he has declined. :) > >I don't think he particularly likes 'computers'... IMHO... >\ I have seen him Tear Sierwan to shreds on ICC, he wins the majority of games, The reason I feel he would do so well against crafty, is that in the recent frankfurt tournament he seemed to have little problems with fritz6 which ran on a super fast machine, I assume that being from the "younger" generation of granmasters he probally has much expierence against computers, although I don't understand why he never plays computers on ICC, Perhaps because he is there to play humans only, and perfers to play computers at home.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.