Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 11:30:26 09/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
I sent to you Stiller's address by e-mail. It’s much faster to generate knnknn than to generate krrkrr. This way, I can start to work on kqqkqq earlier. Eugene On September 14, 1999 at 14:25:49, guy haworth wrote: >Eugene, > >V good news that you are looking at this. > >I agree that a some dummy-run to check the viability of the code is a good idea. > KNNKNN may be mainly draws but I guess it's symmetric and has two pieces the >same on both sides: why not KRRKRR - more wins? > >I look forward to your KQQKQQ results. L.B.Stiller says maxdepth to conversion >is 44 moves so, if he's right which we should assume, there's no need to track >the 50m rule. > >Btw, is L.B.Stiller contactable by any chance? > >I look forward to your news. The GK-v-ROW is playing at 1-ply per 24-hours so >there's some time yet. > >Best regards, Guy Haworth
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.