Author: James Swafford
Date: 15:41:14 09/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
I believe the K6-2 operates at 100 mhz, not 66. Still slower than the Celeron, though. The K6-3 is also full CPU speed. -- James On September 14, 1999 at 13:44:57, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >I beleive TSCP fit entirely into L1 cache. For larger programs / programs with >larger data sets, L2 speed becomes critical. And here K6/2 lags behind at 66Mhz, >vs. full CPU speed for Celeron. > >Eugene > >On September 14, 1999 at 12:59:03, Will Singleton wrote: > >>On September 14, 1999 at 04:55:59, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>Is this really correct: Crafty bench (16.6 and 16.17 both) displays average >>>NPS 175000 for Celeron 300, but "only" 165000 for AMD 450. Is something wrong >>>or has somedody similar results? >>> >>>Jouni >> >>My results show the K6 outperforming the Celeron (I think!). >> >>Latest results for the TSCP nps test: >> >>Platform Compiler nps Dann's build >> >>P3/500 msvc opt 63,246 x >>K6-2/400 msvc opt 57,163 x >>Cel/450 msvc opt 56,075 >>K6-3/450 msvc opt 53,634 x >>P2/450 msvc opt 49,338 x >>K6-2/350 msvc opt 45,679 x >>Cel/400 msvc opt 45,072 x >>Mac G3/300 CW 3.1 opt 40,519 >>K6-2/300 pgcc -0 38,900 >>P2/300 msvc opt 38,223 x >>K6-2/266 msvc opt 38,159 >>K6-2/400 cygwin opt 37,516 >>K6-2/350 borland opt 32,638 >>K6-2/350 symantec opt 32,168 >>P2/300 gcc opt 29,205 >>K6-2/400 msvc no opt 28,745 >>Cyrix 300 msvc opt 25,345 x >>Mac 7300/180 CW 3.1 opt 24,441 >>K6-2/400 cygwin no opt 23,885 >>P6/200 msvc opt 23,581 x >>P5/180 msvc opt 21,624 x >>Cyrix 200 msvc opt 20,398 x >>K5/116 gcc -0 17,200 >>P6/200 watcom opt 16,018
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.