Author: Didzis Cirulis
Date: 02:06:06 09/15/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 15, 1999 at 00:10:34, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On September 14, 1999 at 23:23:24, Lawrence S. Tamarkin wrote: > >>Is it an uninteresting program after-all? Can it not compete with any of the >>other higher rated programs in existence? And my most serious question - Is its >>claims to having a totally orriginal, Unique & human style bogus, or is it that >>which makes it weaker than many other programs? >> >>Larry > > >I have seen two sides to this program. Some versions were wildly aggressive >and usually got rolled up into little balls by decent searcher programs. But >I have also seen versions that were not so overly aggressive, played nice >attacking chess without throwing its position into the toilet to do so. I >have no idea which version(s) are available or which played good/bad. But >it is definitely 'different'... Depends on hareware too... But you may look at games Chess Tal II played in my 99 Summer Tournament. Half of them played by version 2.50, but, after a mail from Thorsten, rest of games were played by 2.03 with Thorsten's style. Tal played a good chess and finished with 10 points of 20. All games and Crosstable available at "My own Computer Chess Site" http://open.konts.lv/usr/Didzis/ http://didzis.cjb.net/ Have a great chess! Didzis Cirulis
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.