Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 09:28:42 09/15/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 14, 1999 at 23:23:24, Lawrence S. Tamarkin wrote: >Is it an uninteresting program after-all? it is an interesting program. > Can it not compete with any of the >other higher rated programs in existence? it can compete against the strongest programs (and lose against the weakest)... :-))) See also my posted match Hiarcs7.32 vs. CSTal2.03. If you don't play via autoplayer cable but using mouse, you will get these results. If you use the cb-autoplayer your results will degenerate the more games you play with a very very tough change e.g. first 10 games 50% and further games 0 %. But what do you want to test, the programs or the capability of the autoplayer to cheat ? > And my most serious question - Is its >claims to having a totally orriginal, Unique & human style bogus, or is it that >which makes it weaker than many other programs? ?? it plays unique i guess. most programs play unique. To get an impression look into the games against hiarcs. Hiarcs is not that weak, isn't it ... :-) >Larry
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.