Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 00:59:58 09/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 15, 1999 at 15:42:28, James T. Walker wrote: >>But what do you want to test, the programs or the capability of >>the autoplayer to cheat ? >*************** >If you have only played 5 games manually how can you be sure that the results >will not follow the results of auto232 games?? I know how strong cstal is. And i have seen the games during the games. > Unless of course you have a hand >in the outcome which is very easy with manual operation and not so easy with >auto232. :-)) a litlle insult, do you think it works :-))) > Why do you continue to say the CB auto232 is cheating. because it is doing so. > I have seen no >proof of this statement from you or anyone else. if you don't see anything, things do not exist ! you materialist ! close your eyes and the earth will not exist under your feet. > Where is your proof. i have seen it working in my home. I do have cb-products and can let it run at home. We have several cases with strange behaviours. They were published. You don't know them. Not my problem. >When you make stupid stamements i don't make those statements :-) >like this without proof your credibility is >diminished. :-)) and yours ? :-)) > Why are the first 10 games 50% and then change?? Do they have to >be continiously played or if you play only one game/day and then shut off the >computer will the CB auto232 still figure out a way to cheat after 10 games?? right. easy job. just save a learning file. >You continue to make nonsense statements about CSTal's strength and CB auto232 >cheating but you can not prove either one. i can proof everything. but you don't see. you would not see the difference between a good program and a weak program if it would play before your eyes. > I have zero confidence in anything >you post here because you are on a mission to prove CSTal is as strong as other >commercial programs yet it cannot beat Crafty in a match which did not use CB >auto232. I don't know if it beats crafty. I have not tested it against crafty. it was somebody else. i have done it against crafty in the past. crafty is not the strongest program. of course it is more interesting to see cstal play against commercial programs. because cstal is commercial too. > Your post should be deleted because of your unfounded attacks on >Chessbase. That's one man's opinion. >Jim Walker >*************** YOUR post should be deleted because you insult me. There is exactly NO insult in my post. You are really a "man" :-))
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.