Author: Shaun Brewer
Date: 13:50:37 09/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
Will, This shows a K6-2 400 better than a K6-3 450 can that be right? I have just done a cheap temporary upgrade M/B and K6-2 400 as my previous CPU cooked when the fan failed, I will at some point be upgrading properly I am considering PIII K6-3 and Althlon depending on price performance. So any more info on the bench marks above would be most usefull. Thanks Shaun On September 14, 1999 at 12:59:03, Will Singleton wrote: >On September 14, 1999 at 04:55:59, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>Is this really correct: Crafty bench (16.6 and 16.17 both) displays average >>NPS 175000 for Celeron 300, but "only" 165000 for AMD 450. Is something wrong >>or has somedody similar results? >> >>Jouni > >My results show the K6 outperforming the Celeron (I think!). > >Latest results for the TSCP nps test: > >Platform Compiler nps Dann's build > >P3/500 msvc opt 63,246 x >K6-2/400 msvc opt 57,163 x >Cel/450 msvc opt 56,075 >K6-3/450 msvc opt 53,634 x >P2/450 msvc opt 49,338 x >K6-2/350 msvc opt 45,679 x >Cel/400 msvc opt 45,072 x >Mac G3/300 CW 3.1 opt 40,519 >K6-2/300 pgcc -0 38,900 >P2/300 msvc opt 38,223 x >K6-2/266 msvc opt 38,159 >K6-2/400 cygwin opt 37,516 >K6-2/350 borland opt 32,638 >K6-2/350 symantec opt 32,168 >P2/300 gcc opt 29,205 >K6-2/400 msvc no opt 28,745 >Cyrix 300 msvc opt 25,345 x >Mac 7300/180 CW 3.1 opt 24,441 >K6-2/400 cygwin no opt 23,885 >P6/200 msvc opt 23,581 x >P5/180 msvc opt 21,624 x >Cyrix 200 msvc opt 20,398 x >K5/116 gcc -0 17,200 >P6/200 watcom opt 16,018
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.