Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chessmaster 3000 not bad on fast hardware.

Author: odell hall

Date: 14:53:52 09/16/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 16, 1999 at 13:16:08, Bradley S., Short wrote:

>The last time I even used Chessmaster 3000 was on a 486/50.   Lately
>I have been playing around with it on a Celeron 366 and it is much
>improved.
>Beat Novag Sapphire 5 to 0 at game in 60 minutes.
>Draw against CM5500 at 3 min per move.
>Draw against CM6000 at 3 min per move.
>
>It takes time to play these 3 min per move games but so far CM3000 hasnt
>been beaten.   It can see over 200,000 postitions per second.  more
>four times 5500 or 6000.
>Both 5500 and 6000 are much more sophisticated programs with better
>algorithms so they would no doubt defeat 3000 in serious matches but
>still I am quite pleased with the old boy.
>I used 3000 to learn to play the game and back then it really used to
>make short work of me.  As I got stronger I began to see its weaknesses..
>Later I got 4000 and went back to getting spanked.
>But now that the hardware is 10 times faster 3000 made a significant leap
>in strength.  Enough to interest me again.
>
>Brad


  If you ask me Chessmaster 3000 is rather weak, I beat it like a step-child
when I had my cyrix 233



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.