Author: Bradley S., Short
Date: 15:55:01 09/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 1999 at 17:53:52, odell hall wrote: >On September 16, 1999 at 13:16:08, Bradley S., Short wrote: > >>The last time I even used Chessmaster 3000 was on a 486/50. Lately >>I have been playing around with it on a Celeron 366 and it is much >>improved. >>Beat Novag Sapphire 5 to 0 at game in 60 minutes. >>Draw against CM5500 at 3 min per move. >>Draw against CM6000 at 3 min per move. >> >>It takes time to play these 3 min per move games but so far CM3000 hasnt >>been beaten. It can see over 200,000 postitions per second. more >>four times 5500 or 6000. >>Both 5500 and 6000 are much more sophisticated programs with better >>algorithms so they would no doubt defeat 3000 in serious matches but >>still I am quite pleased with the old boy. >>I used 3000 to learn to play the game and back then it really used to >>make short work of me. As I got stronger I began to see its weaknesses.. >>Later I got 4000 and went back to getting spanked. >>But now that the hardware is 10 times faster 3000 made a significant leap >>in strength. Enough to interest me again. >> >>Brad > > > If you ask me Chessmaster 3000 is rather weak, I beat it like a step-child >when I had my cyrix 233
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.