Author: Thom Perry
Date: 16:29:53 09/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 1999 at 18:55:01, Bradley S., Short wrote: >On September 16, 1999 at 17:53:52, odell hall wrote: > >>On September 16, 1999 at 13:16:08, Bradley S., Short wrote: >> >>>The last time I even used Chessmaster 3000 was on a 486/50. Lately >>>I have been playing around with it on a Celeron 366 and it is much >>>improved. >>>Beat Novag Sapphire 5 to 0 at game in 60 minutes. >>>Draw against CM5500 at 3 min per move. >>>Draw against CM6000 at 3 min per move. >>> >>>It takes time to play these 3 min per move games but so far CM3000 hasnt >>>been beaten. It can see over 200,000 postitions per second. more >>>four times 5500 or 6000. >>>Both 5500 and 6000 are much more sophisticated programs with better >>>algorithms so they would no doubt defeat 3000 in serious matches but >>>still I am quite pleased with the old boy. >>>I used 3000 to learn to play the game and back then it really used to >>>make short work of me. As I got stronger I began to see its weaknesses.. >>>Later I got 4000 and went back to getting spanked. >>>But now that the hardware is 10 times faster 3000 made a significant leap >>>in strength. Enough to interest me again. >>> >>>Brad >> >> >> If you ask me Chessmaster 3000 is rather weak, I beat it like a step-child >>when I had my cyrix 233
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.