Author: Hristo
Date: 23:32:26 09/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 1999 at 23:03:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On September 16, 1999 at 10:42:02, walter irvin wrote: > >>On September 16, 1999 at 06:35:03, Owen Lyne wrote: >> >>>Benchmarks for Crafty 16.18 >>>--------------------------- >>> >>>167 MHz UltraSparc (Solaris 2.6, compiled with gcc 2.8.1) >>> >>>Total nodes: 61096154 >>>Raw nodes per second: 69035 >>>Total elapsed time: 885 >>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 0.723164 >>> >>>250 MHz UltraSparc (Solaris 2.7, compiled with gcc 2.8.1) >>> >>>Total nodes: 61096154 >>>Raw nodes per second: 95612 >>>Total elapsed time: 639 >>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 1.001565 >>> >>>600 MHz Athlon (wcrafty-16.18.exe from Bob's ftp site) >>> >>>Total nodes: 68509284 >>>Raw nodes per second: 422896 >>>Total elapsed time: 162 >>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 3.950617 >>> >>>Notes: >>>I'm very pleased with my new AMD Athlon 600MHz - that looks like >>>a pretty good benchmark for Crafty to me. Totally vanilla settings, just >>>downloaded the exe file and double-clicked on it, worked like a dream. Next stop >>>Winboard! >>> >>>I've also included bechmarks from the machines at work, this is a compile of my >>>own (I hope we'll get gcc2.95 soon and speed things up), as Bob says, these >>>machines don't see to perform well MHz for MHz and I know they were expensive. >>> >>>Judging by these numbers it would need a 1000MHz UltraSparc to perform as well >>>as my 600MHz Athlon. >>> >>>Owen >>cool i was thinking of getting me one but was not sure what speeds i could >>expect ? now i think i'll go ahead and get one ,looks fast enough for me . > > >If you want raw speed, get a 21264 alpha. Nothing else even comes _close_... What numbers (nodes per sec) are we talking about on the 21264? hristo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.