Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:27:59 09/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 1999 at 02:32:26, Hristo wrote: >On September 16, 1999 at 23:03:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On September 16, 1999 at 10:42:02, walter irvin wrote: >> >>>On September 16, 1999 at 06:35:03, Owen Lyne wrote: >>> >>>>Benchmarks for Crafty 16.18 >>>>--------------------------- >>>> >>>>167 MHz UltraSparc (Solaris 2.6, compiled with gcc 2.8.1) >>>> >>>>Total nodes: 61096154 >>>>Raw nodes per second: 69035 >>>>Total elapsed time: 885 >>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 0.723164 >>>> >>>>250 MHz UltraSparc (Solaris 2.7, compiled with gcc 2.8.1) >>>> >>>>Total nodes: 61096154 >>>>Raw nodes per second: 95612 >>>>Total elapsed time: 639 >>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 1.001565 >>>> >>>>600 MHz Athlon (wcrafty-16.18.exe from Bob's ftp site) >>>> >>>>Total nodes: 68509284 >>>>Raw nodes per second: 422896 >>>>Total elapsed time: 162 >>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 3.950617 >>>> >>>>Notes: >>>>I'm very pleased with my new AMD Athlon 600MHz - that looks like >>>>a pretty good benchmark for Crafty to me. Totally vanilla settings, just >>>>downloaded the exe file and double-clicked on it, worked like a dream. Next stop >>>>Winboard! >>>> >>>>I've also included bechmarks from the machines at work, this is a compile of my >>>>own (I hope we'll get gcc2.95 soon and speed things up), as Bob says, these >>>>machines don't see to perform well MHz for MHz and I know they were expensive. >>>> >>>>Judging by these numbers it would need a 1000MHz UltraSparc to perform as well >>>>as my 600MHz Athlon. >>>> >>>>Owen >>>cool i was thinking of getting me one but was not sure what speeds i could >>>expect ? now i think i'll go ahead and get one ,looks fast enough for me . >> >> >>If you want raw speed, get a 21264 alpha. Nothing else even comes _close_... > >What numbers (nodes per sec) are we talking about on the 21264? > >hristo Something in the 850K range for a 667mhz box, although faster ones are available... (750 at least, probably 1ghz very soon. 1M nps+ will be very realistic for that box...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.