Author: walter irvin
Date: 07:53:36 09/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 1999 at 09:27:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On September 17, 1999 at 02:32:26, Hristo wrote: > >>On September 16, 1999 at 23:03:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On September 16, 1999 at 10:42:02, walter irvin wrote: >>> >>>>On September 16, 1999 at 06:35:03, Owen Lyne wrote: >>>> >>>>>Benchmarks for Crafty 16.18 >>>>>--------------------------- >>>>> >>>>>167 MHz UltraSparc (Solaris 2.6, compiled with gcc 2.8.1) >>>>> >>>>>Total nodes: 61096154 >>>>>Raw nodes per second: 69035 >>>>>Total elapsed time: 885 >>>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 0.723164 >>>>> >>>>>250 MHz UltraSparc (Solaris 2.7, compiled with gcc 2.8.1) >>>>> >>>>>Total nodes: 61096154 >>>>>Raw nodes per second: 95612 >>>>>Total elapsed time: 639 >>>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 1.001565 >>>>> >>>>>600 MHz Athlon (wcrafty-16.18.exe from Bob's ftp site) >>>>> >>>>>Total nodes: 68509284 >>>>>Raw nodes per second: 422896 >>>>>Total elapsed time: 162 >>>>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 3.950617 >>>>> >>>>>Notes: >>>>>I'm very pleased with my new AMD Athlon 600MHz - that looks like >>>>>a pretty good benchmark for Crafty to me. Totally vanilla settings, just >>>>>downloaded the exe file and double-clicked on it, worked like a dream. Next stop >>>>>Winboard! >>>>> >>>>>I've also included bechmarks from the machines at work, this is a compile of my >>>>>own (I hope we'll get gcc2.95 soon and speed things up), as Bob says, these >>>>>machines don't see to perform well MHz for MHz and I know they were expensive. >>>>> >>>>>Judging by these numbers it would need a 1000MHz UltraSparc to perform as well >>>>>as my 600MHz Athlon. >>>>> >>>>>Owen >>>>cool i was thinking of getting me one but was not sure what speeds i could >>>>expect ? now i think i'll go ahead and get one ,looks fast enough for me . >>> >>> >>>If you want raw speed, get a 21264 alpha. Nothing else even comes _close_... >> >>What numbers (nodes per sec) are we talking about on the 21264? >> >>hristo > > >Something in the 850K range for a 667mhz box, although faster ones are >available... (750 at least, probably 1ghz very soon. 1M nps+ will be >very realistic for that box... i know very very little about the alpha ,i want the absolute fastest machine possible ,but i have to be able to put a chess program on it .is a alpha ibm compatible , could i put a crafty on it .could i program on it?? i have only programed on ibm thats all .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.