Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Standard Naming of Unmoves?

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 10:16:37 09/17/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 17, 1999 at 03:06:15, Dave Gomboc wrote:
[snip]
>I want to represent possible unmoves to allow backpropagation of scores from a
>position to all of its previously visited predecessors.  I want to avoid the
>recomputation of possible unmoves at each node visit, and I would like to
>associate other data with each such connecting edge.
>
>It would be possible for me to invent some notation for my own use easily
>enough; I thought there might be a few other people with a desire for a standard
>unmove notation.
Why not just use ordinary PGN put a minus sign in the front?  Pawn captures
might be a bit funny, and the opposite of a4 would be -a3, but it seems like it
would work.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.