Author: odell hall
Date: 11:47:21 09/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 1999 at 09:23:17, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On September 17, 1999 at 02:06:35, odell hall wrote: > >>On September 17, 1999 at 00:02:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On September 16, 1999 at 23:42:22, odell hall wrote: >>> >>>>On September 16, 1999 at 21:06:24, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>>> >>>>>On September 16, 1999 at 19:29:53, Thom Perry wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On September 16, 1999 at 18:55:01, Bradley S., Short wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On September 16, 1999 at 17:53:52, odell hall wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On September 16, 1999 at 13:16:08, Bradley S., Short wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>The last time I even used Chessmaster 3000 was on a 486/50. Lately >>>>>>>>>I have been playing around with it on a Celeron 366 and it is much >>>>>>>>>improved. >>>>>>>>>Beat Novag Sapphire 5 to 0 at game in 60 minutes. >>>>>>>>>Draw against CM5500 at 3 min per move. >>>>>>>>>Draw against CM6000 at 3 min per move. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>It takes time to play these 3 min per move games but so far CM3000 hasnt >>>>>>>>>been beaten. It can see over 200,000 postitions per second. more >>>>>>>>>four times 5500 or 6000. >>>>>>>>>Both 5500 and 6000 are much more sophisticated programs with better >>>>>>>>>algorithms so they would no doubt defeat 3000 in serious matches but >>>>>>>>>still I am quite pleased with the old boy. >>>>>>>>>I used 3000 to learn to play the game and back then it really used to >>>>>>>>>make short work of me. As I got stronger I began to see its weaknesses.. >>>>>>>>>Later I got 4000 and went back to getting spanked. >>>>>>>>>But now that the hardware is 10 times faster 3000 made a significant leap >>>>>>>>>in strength. Enough to interest me again. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Brad >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you ask me Chessmaster 3000 is rather weak, I beat it like a step-child >>>>>>>>when I had my cyrix 233 >>>>> >>>>>Stop and think for a moment and perhaps you can come up with a very nice analogy >>>>>or metaphor involving someone of a different race. Imagine for a moment how mad >>>>>a whole bunch of people would get if you used this analogy in this group, and >>>>>your best response to this would perhaps be to go hide under a rock. >>>>> >>>>>Now imagine an analogy involving some light belligerent intent, or reference to >>>>>a meat product, or something like that. If you use this analogy, perhaps it >>>>>offends someone, and your response would be something like, "excuse me for >>>>>living, buster". >>>>> >>>>>There has been a complaint about the analogy at the end of the quoted post. I >>>>>think the analogy is somewhere between the two situations described in my >>>>>previous two paragraphs. I can see the point of the complaint, but I don't want >>>>>to delete the post. I would ask that people consider carefully the effect their >>>>>words will have on the large and diverse population of people who read CCC, and >>>>>please try to use images that won't result in complaints to the CCC moderator >>>>>alias. >>>>> >>>>>Thanks, >>>>> >>>>>bruce >>>>> >>>>>PS. It is possible that another moderator may feel differently and delete the >>>>>thread. If so, nevermind. >>>> >>>> >>>>Bruce I seriously doubt if there is any moderator or "reasonable" person that >>>>would find such a innocent remark offensive. Unless such a person is Seriously >>>>insecure. >>> >>>I don't consider it offensive.. I _do_ consider it to be horribly poor >>>taste... >> >> >> Ok Bob I concede, that it may have been of poor taste, (defpending on the >>audience) but for me it was said completely without a second thought, as it is a >>very common folk saying where I am from, I had no idea anyone would find this >>remark offensive, I mean it is like I am afraid to breathe around here, this >>newsgroup has become extremely sensitive, hell maybe I would be better off at >>rgcc. I will make this my last post I think I will feel a little more >>comfortable somewhere where my every word no matter how well intentioned will >>not be put under a microscope and judged. Excuse me for living ! > > >Grow up. I didn't say a thing about the above until after it started getting >discussed. It ranks right up there with "GDMF" and similar expressions using >four-letter words. But it didn't make me write to the moderators, I just >thought "geez, totally tasteless" and went on. > >So get off the high-horse...I only pointed out that it was horribly worded, >I don't care how 'flippant' it was. It is even worse than "I beat it like >I beat my wife"... > >There are plenty of better metaphors around... I think your overreacting to my post using language way to strong, as far as my metaphors being in poor taste, need I remind you of the Robert Hyatt Lexicon, where you use terminology that makes my language sound "very Mild", so I think you are the last person to make any comment about my use of language.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.