Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:24:04 09/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 18, 1999 at 18:16:20, Steve McRiley wrote: >Call it 'cheating' or not. Everybody know what you are doing Thorsten. > >/McRiley I don't think you will ever KNOW what i do. If i would cheat, i would not have been able to evaluate any software in the right area over the last 10 years or more. But i have written about frans morsch dedicated machines (e.g. Sphinx Dominator) and realized that this machine is not knowing anything long time before fritz. I knew Mark would be champion (where have i cheaten there ??) and i knew stefan would win (how cheaten ??). It is easy. just let the programs play against each other and watch the information the show. Thats all. you don't need more. But your kind of arrogance is something special. you call me cheater because i present results you don't believe. You believe i would manipulate just because i play manually , and you don't come to the idea a machine could betray or cheat or influence. Ossi Weiner also did not believe that he would lose against cstal in Paderborn 1995. But it was easy. so i gave him the 30 games i have played out before the championship. he still did not believed it. this is the arrogance you and your kind of people rely on. i can only laugh about this nice arrogance. cause as long as you behave this way, yours will never understand and find out who will win or who is stronger-. cb came with 4 hyper-programs and many resources. but they were unable to beat a single programmer with a single-cpu in a swiss-tournament. because it is THIS KIND OF ARROGANCE. and all others know it. That it is this kind of arrogance that stops them. and will stop them. they are not flexible enough.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.