Author: Owen Lyne
Date: 03:01:49 09/20/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 17, 1999 at 12:47:03, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >On a 256Mb machine you must be able to generate all 5-man pawnless TBs. Maybe >you'll be able to generate TBs with pawns, but here I have some doubts - it >looks that paging will slow it down too much. In any case you can try, and if >one iteration will took less than (say) two hours you'll be able to do that. Glad to hear I can do 5 man pawnless OK, and when I have I'll report whether those with pawns can get an iteration done in a few hours. >I beleive that you can use compressed TBs during generation; just don't use >memory-mapping files (-p), use TB caching (-c <cache amount>). Of course it'll >be slightly slower, but not much. Excellent! >Theoretically it's possible to modify the generator so it'll produce compressed >TBs, but I hate to do that. You can try if you wish :-) I'll pass on that one... If I can generate with all subtables compressed I'll have plenty discspace to generate a single uncompressed table, so that's fine. Thanks again, Owen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.