Author: eric guttenberg
Date: 14:56:37 09/20/99
I note that H7.32 scored 22.5-17.5 over F5.32 at 40/2. However I believe several posts have shown F5.32 outperforming H7.32 at 40/2 in manually played games(Shep's recent tournament comes to mind though I well understand that it was only 10 or 11 games for each program). Playing a game at 40/2 manually is so time consuming that there may never be enough such games to permit any definite conclusions, but is there not a suggestion that in some cases autoplayer results may differ from manual results? I do not want to be in Thorsten's corner on this (although there seems to be plenty of room there) but this is not the first time that someone has raised the question of whether the autoplayer can somehow affect the play of a program. Does anyone think that it is possible that, for example, H7.32 is slightly stronger than F5.32 on autoplayer, but that F5.32 is slightly stronger in manual games? eric
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.