Author: blass uri
Date: 15:59:24 09/20/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 20, 1999 at 17:56:37, eric guttenberg wrote: >I note that H7.32 scored 22.5-17.5 over F5.32 at 40/2. However I believe >several posts have shown F5.32 outperforming H7.32 at 40/2 in manually >played games I do not know about these several posts about manually played games. The only case that I know is shep's tournament but 6 out of 11 against 4.5 out of 11 is not a significant result. I know that in thorsten's tournament Hiarcs7.01 outperformed F532 in 40/2 manually played games. I think that Fritz532 should lose at long time controls because Fritz is a root processor and sometimes the evaluation is changed after trading queens with no reason. Hiarcs7.32's problem is the book (I saw one game when hiarcs7.32 lost when the evaluation out of book was more than 5 pawns against hiarcs). Hiarcs7.01's book is better. There is also a difference between tournament and matches because the learning functions influence the result more in matches. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.