Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 00:46:18 09/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 1999 at 01:11:44, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >On September 21, 1999 at 00:52:11, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>FEN 8/1p5P/3p2n1/6P1/4K3/3p4/1pk5/7R w - - >> >>I think logical continuation is: >> >>47. Kf5 d2 >>48. Kxg6 d1Q >>49. Rxd1 Kxd1 >>50. h8Q d1Q+ >>51. Kf7 Qa2+ >>52. Ke7 with eternal checks and/or eating pawn g5 = 1/2-1/2 >> >>Jouni > >I think that if this were a game between Kasparov and Karpov that a draw would >have been agreed to over twenty moves ago. I fail to see the excitement in >playing out a drawn game. This game is way too slow. Queen endings are very difficult. I don't think anybody understands the computer analysis of KQPkq. Here the black pawns might actually help shield the white K and since his g-pawn is closer to queening... Aftre 52. Qe2+ Kd8 or the evaluation after even 51.Kh6 are not so obvious to me, but then I haven't looked at it very long. > >Tim Frohlick
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.