Author: Keith Kitson
Date: 12:53:33 09/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
Having followed this thread through I reckon the majority of people will realise that 2.50 is not considered as strong as 2.03 therefore its quoted position in the results table must be suspect. It is just a pity more care wasn't taken to determine the nature of 2.5 before including it in the tournament. I understand the trials and tribulations of the programmers that release betas. One bad result does not help publicity for the release version. I look forward to the next release version of CSTAl with interest. Keith
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.