Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:18:33 09/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 1999 at 19:12:07, odell hall wrote: [snip] > I considered this possibility you mentioned, the only thing that makes me >doubt that it is the chip is the fact, that when I play hiarcs7. in computer vs >computer games on my machine it "destroyes" everything. I beat a friend of mine >who has CM6000 in a six game match, this makes me think it is not the chip. That's a puzzle. If it "destroys" all the competition, why do you believe that their evals (which differ considerably) are better? If they really had a superior evaluation at crucial points of the program, wouldn't they win all/most of the time? Perhaps Hiarcs has a much greater positional understanding? I do know that (at least against computers) Hiarcs seems to fare very well. There may be some particular list of parameters where Hiarcs has a weakness. Perhaps if you can specify exactly the conditions of the experiment we can figure out what is going on. [snip]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.