Author: Joshua Lee
Date: 19:00:37 09/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 21, 1999 at 20:49:47, Ralf Elvsén wrote: >On September 21, 1999 at 20:38:12, odell hall wrote: > >>Hi CCC >> >> In an attempt to explain the discrepancy of moves between my hiarcs7.32 and >>others in this group I looked at my "engine parameters" within the fritz5.32 >>interface this is what I had >> >>Playing style=Normal >>contempt value 15 >>hash =38912 >>selectivity=5 >>Postional learning=on >>use of tablebases=on >> >> >>Is this how it should look? Is my selectivity correct? Otherwise I am simply at >>a loss to explain the move discrepancy > >Except for hash, it is identical to my parameters. > >Ralf Yep that is it but i would reccomend 35840kb for Hash tables, awhile back i posted my results for Hiarcs mark and that setting was best on the long test at 35840:) i have a K6-2 300 with 64Mb (maybe someone out there can tell me if more memory 128MB+ (282MB tops is what hiarcs can use) will get better result on the test.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.