Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 12:08:56 09/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 22, 1999 at 11:57:27, Wayne Lowrance wrote:
>On September 22, 1999 at 11:28:30, Hans Christian Lykke wrote:
>Are you sure you dont have one of those screwy Hiarcs versions that seem to be
>out there (IE: recent posts). Then again, after thought, you probobly are using
>the Hiarcs book, which of course would be proper. Your early result seems to be
>biasing in the wrong direction even with Hiarcs book.
>
>
>>[Event "SSDF 40/2"]
>>[Site "DK-Albertslund"]
>>[Date "1999.09.22"]
>>[Round "5"]
>>[White "Hiarcs 7.32 P200MMX 47MB"]
>>[Black "Junior 5 P200MMX 45MB"]
>>[Result "0-1"]
>>[ECO "C16"]
>>[WhiteElo "2577"]
>>[BlackElo "2543"]
>>[Annotator "Test: HC Lykke"]
>>[PlyCount "101"]
>>[EventDate "1999.09.20"]
>>
>>{47872kB, Hiarcs.ctg. Pentium 200MMX 47MB
>>} 1. e4 {0} 1... e6 {0} 2. d4 {0}
>>2... d5 {0} 3. Nc3 {0} 3... Bb4 {0} 4. e5 {0} 4... b6 {0} 5. Qg4 {0} 5... Bf8 {
>>0} 6. Nh3 {0} 6... c5 {last book move 170} 7. Bg5 {0.87/8 278} 7... Qd7 {508}
>>8. dxc5 {0.98/9 416} 8... bxc5 {329} 9. Bb5 {0.98/9 0} 9... Nc6 {66} 10. O-O-O
>>{0.88/8 187} 10... Qb7 {213} 11. Bxc6+ {0.23/8 697} 11... Qxc6 {54} 12. Rhe1 {
>>0.21/8 54} 12... Rb8 {127} 13. Kb1 {0.06/8 172} 13... Qb7 {242} 14. b3 {
>>0.11/8 220} 14... Bd7 {226} 15. Bc1 {-0.01/8 35} 15... c4 {245} 16. Qg5 {
>>-0.11/8 308} 16... a5 {242} 17. Ba3 {-0.07/8 153} 17... cxb3 {209} 18. cxb3 {
>>-0.17/9 207} 18... a4 {303} 19. Bd6 {0.00/9 0} 19... Rc8 {341} 20. Kb2 {
>>-0.34/8 320} 20... Nh6 {0} 21. Bxf8 {-0.34/8 478} 21... Kxf8 {87} 22. Rd3 {
>>-0.62/9 641} 22... Qa6 {424} 23. Nf4 {-0.53/8 243} 23... axb3 {92} 24. axb3 {
>>-0.62/8 32} 24... Ra8 {392} 25. g4 {-0.64/9 68} 25... Bb5 {154} 26. Nxb5 {
>>-0.63/9 511} 26... Qa2+ {125} 27. Kc3 {-0.47/9 255} 27... Qa5+ {0} 28. b4 {
>>-0.52/9 754} 28... Qxb5 {0} 29. Rd4 {-0.78/9 323} 29... Qa4 {23} 30. Kd3 {
>>0.25/7 56} 30... Qb3+ {201} 31. Ke2 {0.41/8 59} 31... Qb2+ {159} 32. Ke3 {
>>0.41/9 0} 32... Ng8 {282} 33. Nd3 {0.54/9 0} 33... Qa2 {216} 34. Rc1 {
>>0.63/9 105} 34... h6 {234} 35. Qh4 {0.50/9 0} 35... g5 {515} 36. Qh5 {
>>0.82/9 193} 36... Ne7 {146} 37. h4 {0.00/9 271} 37... Ng6 {192} 38. Rc7 {
>>-0.48/9 4} 38... Kg8 {191} 39. b5 {-0.57/7 119} 39... Rh7 {90} 40. Rc3 {
>>-1.69/7 39} 40... Qa5 {144} 41. Rc2 {-1.27/9 184} 41... Nxh4 {6} 42. Ke2 {
>>-1.55/9 190} 42... Qxb5 {190} 43. Rb4 {-1.73/9 348} 43... Qa5 {0} 44. Rcb2 {
>>-1.48/9 168} 44... Qa1 {180} 45. Nf4 {-1.73/9 506} 45... Rc8 {153} 46. Nd3 {
>>-2.01/10 412} 46... Ng6 {207} 47. Rb6 {-1.88/8 277} 47... Kg7 {432} 48. Rb7 {
>>-3.15/9 375} 48... Rc3 {493} 49. Qh2 {-4.32/8 619} 49... Rh8 {0} 50. R7b3 {
>>-7.93/7 286} 50... Rxd3 {154} 51. Kxd3 {adjud. -7.93/8 0} 0-1
Do people actually use learning in Hiarcs together with the Hiarcs book (with
the weights from Hiarcs 7)? I thought this was discouraged, because the Hiarcs
weighting system was different than that of Fritz. Do I misunderstand the
situation?
Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.