Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 07:43:21 09/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 23, 1999 at 01:27:40, blass uri wrote: >On September 22, 1999 at 18:15:31, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On September 22, 1999 at 17:28:55, Steve McRiley wrote: >> >>>Downloading the upgrad 'as we speak' >> >>Thanks ! I am much interested in your data. >>I am doing games myself n the moment. very interesting game >>vs. junior on my machines. >>Sacrifycing game !! >>Have finished the 10 games vs. hiarcs. >>hiarcs won by 5.5-4.5 ! >>CStal lost all 3 games . >>whatever. cstal has NOT lost 10-0 or 9-1. >>it was close. >> >>Wow. Junior is very fast an makes many NPS on my 400 Mhz machine. >>how shall cstal stand this ????? > >The number of NPS is not important. >I believe that it is possible to do better program not only in games but also in >solving tactics with lower NPS because if you are too fast you cannot use >knowledge where to search. > >Junior5's NPs like other program's Nps(but not all programs) include also >illegal moves so I do not see the point of comparing NP's when the definition of >NP is not the same. > >Uri At least we know they don't include illegal underpromotions. ;-) Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.