Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CSTal2.03-Nimzo98, games 8-10/10, finished

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 09:48:34 09/25/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 25, 1999 at 11:23:10, Thorsten Czub wrote:


>>I did exactly what you asked for, except that I
>>am not that fool to buy 2 new PCs for $2000-$3000 to get Tal run on an
>>"accurate" machine.
>
>
>2x 200 DM would have been enough. you exaggerating as usual harald.

You are more stupid than I ever thought. But I won't calculate here in public
why 2x200DM would not be enough.

>> Your behaviour looks like Chessbase autoplayer. Absolutely
>>stupid.
>
>right. the cb autoplayer is stupid. you got it right in the end.

I got it right at the start when strange requests came like "cannot access the
endgame databases".

>>Show me more results than a) your results and b) more than this posted 2-2
>>against Hiarcs7.32 and don't forget to sum up the Tal losses like that 6-0 or my
>>7.5-2.5.
>
>your results don't count !

I know, because they see Tal lose.

>>I do not excuse a thing. You always excuse the losses. First it was the version.
>
>it is not my fault if you use a version you are not allowed to test nor
>to download. the illagal act was on your side. learn to read before you
>download. that would of course need a brain.

If you could read you'd see that I tested 2.03...

>>Now it is the hardware although Tal used 50% faster hardware than the opponent.
>
>this is not important.

Haha, you disqualify yourself for the thousandth time with this statement.

>>I wonder what you'd have said if I had played on 2 K6-3-500, probably that I
>>should have used the K7 or P3 or any other senseless story.
>
>i have never said you should use expensive hardware. i said you should test
>seriously. using scientific methods. and not downloading a broken version,
>giving it 3 minutes exact time without pb playing email chess :-)

Read above how the games Nimzo98-CSTal..*2.03* were played.

>>Of course, you are absolutely objective, posting only the few Tal wins and
>>hiding the losses.
>
>i am objective. yes. and the reason is that i am testing many many programs.
>not only one. and i am doing it all of the time. for years.
>that makes me objective. that i tested mchess long time before you have been
>here.

One can drive 50 years by car without an accident, by only driving not faster
than 30km/h!




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.