Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CSTal-2 vs Hiarcs 7.32

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 13:21:48 09/26/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 26, 1999 at 14:57:43, James T. Walker wrote:

>I have now played 8 games between CSTal-2 and Hiarcs 7.32 at 40/2hrs.  I must
>admit the way CSTal-2 plays with the original "Chess style" is not too bad.  So
>far there have been 6 draws and 1 win by each program.


so you have 8 games and 4-4
that gives 50% although you did not "cheat" like some people tried
to suggest here !
so now you come to the same results. although i am sure YOU don't cheat.
aha.

Please understand that you now test exactly the same setting like
i have played my 10 games.
only that you have maybe faster machines.
so this should be even an advantage for cstal.

will the people who have suggested that i have betrayed and manipulated
excuse towards me ?
They have said that I am cheating because THEY did not have the right
versions, the right styles.
I have posted my games and the styles and the settings.
you all had been able to read this .
but instead of reading my results you claimed
that i have played MORE than 10 games and selected only the good ones.
or that i manipulated somehow else e.g. by selecting the opening
book. some have suggested i had a broken machine, or my hiarcs was broken.
and now - using the same versions, the same conditions in the first trial
you get the same results.
pah - this forum here is a fools cage-.

so when will the people who have thrown mud on me because i said
cstal has no problems with hiarcs and will get at leat 50%
excuse to me because THEY have been wrong ?

ok - i give up.
i am paid (on chris payroll).
i manipulate.
i select games out of infinite losses.
and only YOU only YOU all here are objective.

thanks my friends.
its really good to see how many professionals we do have here. and how
the professionals exchange opinions in this forum.



>  Hiarcs has had white 5
>times and CSTal-2 only 3 times so I will play 2 more games with CSTal-2 as
>white.

cstal is better playing white. yes indeed.


>  This is much better results than with Thorsten's style for CSTal-2.

of course.


>I've said it before and I'll say it again, you will like playing against this
>program.  It likes to attack and you must always be alert to sacrifices.  I'll
>post the games later if anyone is interested.
>Jim Walker


nobody is interested in the truth. you cheat - you are on chris payroll.
you lie. you betray.

i give up.
better spend my energy on collecting post-stamps or going into politics.

sorry but i am disapointed.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.