Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 07:53:50 09/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 26, 1999 at 21:06:08, Thorsten Czub wrote: <BIG SNIP> >i guess today the ranking looks ok. >i don't understand why tiger is a weak program :-)))) >but if they would test it on 450 mhz machines they would see HOW >strong it is. >why do these guys always INFLUENCE the statistics ? >i mean: i trust the numbers or not. >saying: tiger is weak, i don't give it the 450 machines and instead >test it on p90 !!!!!! (5 times slower !!!!) Actually tiger is the strongest ( or more correct: Has the higest rating for a program running on a P90 )program on a P90 ever according to SSDF chairman Thoralf K! I think most people with interest in computer chess knows that this meens Tiger is pretty strong! Torstein >is not really interesting to us, or ? >we want to know how strong tiger is in relation to the 450 Mhz machines. >these are some critics. > >despite these few points (maybe i have forgotten some) the list looks >very ok. >i do often use it myself. >of course they should have never allowed cb this special arrangement they >did. >this was not ok. >it was against the common sense. >but - this is a private especially swedish club (foreigners not allowed!!!) >and it is their affair. >my main critic is that the they avoke a kind of scientific outlook they >cannot fullfill in real. >so people misuse their list. >use the gaps within the system. >this is not fair in my opinion.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.