Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF Corruption

Author: Bertil Eklund

Date: 12:32:53 09/27/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 27, 1999 at 15:10:06, Ratko V Tomic wrote:

>> Overwhelming evidence of fraud and corruption. The probabilities that
>> you or anyone had to be conceived and born are almost infinitesimal.
>> Therefore, and according to your statistics , you probably don't exist.
>
>Not exactly the same. If you give some general properties, such as
>"only programs from CB on top hardware" than it is perfectly legitimate
>to compute in how many ways such properties are satisfied compared to all
>possible combinations. It is conceptually no different than estimating
>the odds of "4 dice giving 6" etc.  While generally it would not have
>occured to me to even look at the odds here, there was an ongoing
>controversy with SSDF and their pro-CB bias, so much so that they have
>a response to the accusations on their web page.
>
>The fact that, just in time for the Christmas shopping season, they hand-picked
>4 CB products to be at the top of their chart (by virtue of putting them,
>and only them, on top hardware) only adds another bit to the existent picture.
>If they had only limited number of fast machines, there are so many other
>ways to arrange tests to be even-handed and fair to all other programs,
>that no amount of the rationalizations on their web page can explain it.
>
>In addition to this latest pick and the earlier controversy about the
>proprietary CB autoplayer, one can also question their allowing their
>testers to mostly overlook the problems with killer books, opponent
>recognition, and other similar tricks. Since such gimmicks are well known,
>there should be in place a set of effective and strict measures to detect
>such and disqualify offending programs, or at least disqualify their
>results achieved by such means (unrelated to program's chess playing
>quality/strength, as would be perceived by an end user).

 Next list should appear in november and should in this case be the
christmas-list. Hopefully we can include programs like Chess-tiger,
Rebel-Century and maybe the upcoming Shredder4 in the next list, if we receive
them in time. I guess if these programs don“t top our list or if they do, people
like you could always find something else that could be questioned.

Bertil SSDF



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.