Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hiarcs 7.32 vs. 7.0

Author: Enrique Irazoqui

Date: 05:54:53 09/28/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 28, 1999 at 08:40:06, Shep wrote:

>On September 28, 1999 at 06:49:54, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>
>
>>If H7.32 is weaker then H7.01 my guess it´s because of the table-bases that
>>slows it down a lot in the endgame. If you have played both versions I guess you
>>should have recognized it immediately.
>
>I wouldn't say it gets slowed down "a lot". I have never seen Hiarcs drop below
>its usual middle game node count even during heavy tablebase access.
>Maybe it would be faster without them, but certainly not to the point where it
>is actually harmful.
>If TB usage is indeed counterproductive, it is probably not related to decreased
>search speed.
>Example: FIN09 from Louguet II. Hiarcs 7.0 solves this in 18 minutes on my
>P6-233 while 7.32 cannot solve it in 40 minutes! Yet this is a position where
>a) Hiarcs does not slow down to a crawl (although it does probe them
>   a lot more than e.g. Nimzo) and
>b) tablebases are quite useful IMO
>
>Besides, if indeed 7.32 plays weaker than 7.0 in general, it is definitely not
>tablebase-related; for example in my recent big tournament, there were only two
>games where Hiarcs ever probed the TB's, and neither of them was anything but a
>draw anyway.
>
>---
>Shep

I think that H732 is stronger than H701 (so does Mark), even if only because
it's faster. But it also knows a bit better. I didn't notice significant slower
searches when accessing tablebases, maybe because I copied them to disk.

Enrique



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.