Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 12:26:26 09/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 28, 1999 at 15:11:51, Dann Corbit wrote: >On September 28, 1999 at 15:04:38, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>On September 28, 1999 at 14:42:24, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On September 27, 1999 at 12:11:16, KarinsDad wrote: >>> >>>>I had wanted (and promised) to send a white paper to CCC this month on the topic >>>>of compressing any legal random position into 20 bytes. However, I have so many >>>>irons in the fire right now, that I am having difficulties getting time to work >>>>on anything chess related (my program included). >>>> >>>>But, I wanted to update people on my progress. >>>> >>>>I currently have 13 cases out of 351 of 161 bits. The other 338 cases are 160 >>>>bits or fewer. However, I am not positive of the accuracy of this data due to >>>>the complexity of one of the algorithms. But, it appears to be fairly close to >>>>being accurate. I have been working a little on finishing this one algorithm in >>>>order to finish the white paper, but it is slow going. >>>> >>>>Again, my apologies. >>>In that case, we'll let you live -- as long as you can get the size down to 140 >>>bits. >>>;-) >> >>Not even 160 bits? Man, are you harsh. <g> > >I was cutting him a ton of slack. I have a friend who thinks he can get it down >to around 100. >;-) <grin> hahahahahaha This is someone who you showed Nievergelt's comments to, or are you referring to Nievergelt himself? :-) Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.