Author: blass uri
Date: 14:56:41 09/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 28, 1999 at 16:26:53, Dann Corbit wrote: >On September 28, 1999 at 16:22:11, blass uri wrote: > >>On September 28, 1999 at 15:53:35, Dann Corbit wrote: >><snipped> >>>1. I support the SSDF >> >>I think the main problems that I see with the ssdf games are: >> >>1)Big part of the games are not public so it is impossible to check if there are >>mistakes in the games(I found a mistake in some games when Junior was slowed >>down by a significant factor because the tester used another application in the >>same time and the tester repeated the games but unfortunately it is impossible >>to check if there are mistakes in secret games. >This is *mostly* an old problem. They seem to publish new games here. Do you >still see this as an issue? Yes They publish only part of the new games so it is an issue. There are some secret programs they do not publish games of them and they do not publish big part of the games between known programs. I was interested to found information about Junior5(p200)-Hiarcs7.0(P200) games when Hiarcs won 28.5:11.5 to see if there are mistakes in these games and found no information about these games. The same for all the matches when Junior lost except one match when Junior5(p200) lost against Hiarcs732(K6 450) 23:17 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.