Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 21:05:35 09/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 28, 1999 at 23:46:42, robert michelena wrote: >The fact that Shep, as well as Didzis (http://www.konts.lv/usr/Didzis/) have >the Tiger to test proves my point. Tiger IS AVAILABLE for testing; being >available to the public is irrelevent to my argument. > >If SDDF were truly serious about the rating list (and dispel the growing >anxiety among the rank and file ) they would do the following. Run controlled >matches between ALL programs where the same hardware is available to all. >Failing that, change to a format similiar to Sheps. Invitational tournaments. > >As it is now, reasonable people may infer, as a result of the suspicious >allocation of resources to Chessbase products (suspicious in that the SDDF was >accused of a similiar malfeasance before ), that "..something rotting...in the >state of Denmark[read SWEDEN]" (with apologies to Shakespere and the spirit of >'Hamlet'). > >In short, if Dann would explain to all of us (if he has, then I apologize) what >interest he has in chessbase, or in the integrity of the SDDF list. I am struck >by the passion with which he defends and evicerates all who even dare whisper >heresey against the meatballs. Dann, could it be you are an employee?? > >Just wondering. I already explained it in another post. I will say no more on the topic. >By the way, I own Hiarcs 7.32 and I have to agree; there is something erratic >about its performance. I too noticed its prediliction for queenside castling. >And on one occasion, while fighting the forces of mass programmers in Yahoo >chess, Hiarcs drew a game, in which it had, in the middle game, a 2 pawn lead. >Very odd. If anybody has any comments, please let me know. Otherwise, I love >it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.