Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 10:27:45 09/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
>Posted by Howard Exner on September 29, 1999 at 12:24:13: > >>I therefore see no reason any longer that Rebel10 should not support >>auto232. Auto232 in Rebel10 becomes active if you copy a file. To be >>more precisely do: >> >>COPY USERINFO.CFG to AUTO232.CFG >> >>Then check the menu OPTIONS (F3) and the "auto232" option should >>be present. >> >>Ed Schroder >> >>Posted on CCC and Rebel-Board > >Now that you support auto232,despite its flaws, is this a go ahead to include >Rebel 10 and Rebel Century in future SSDF matches? I use auto232 since they the day it became available, 1994 I believe. Others do the very same. SSDF is almost entirely based on auto232. I have never questioned the results of auto232 until I became suspicious about one year ago and started to be more careful judging its output. I estimate I have checked some 45-50 games last year and only found 2-3 moves that weren't correct. That is not much still it remains unacceptable. My reasoning to support auto232 again is three ways: 1) all programs have the same problem (no idea into what extend) and 2) there is nothing else and 3) nobody is going to give up auto232 despite its flaws as playing manually is no alternative. Ed Schroder
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.