Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: LCTII Part 2

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 10:37:22 09/29/99

Go up one level in this thread


On September 29, 1999 at 12:41:54, Joshua Lee wrote:

>I didn't expect to see so much of a response to my message.... anyhow the
>ratings may not
>mean anything but last time i checked people say hiarcs 7.32 is the best
>software out there. (despite book problems??) What a coincidence it also solves
>the most positions on the test (not counting Rebel 10 which is also a very good
>program as you all know except i think the E.O.C is'nt exactly fair you might
That is right. Don't use the EOC when testing LCT-II as the EOC database
knows a lot of the LCT-II positions and therefore has an advantage.

>as well cook lines in
>your openings book).  I remember some people complaining about
>cooked-books   how come people aren't complaining about Rebel 10? My only
>complaint is that Rebel 8 did better on the Endgame part of the LCTII test.

This can happen with such a low number of positions.

>Another thing i am a little upset that it took 3 years for someone to use  my
>Idea, back when people were on the old newsgroup i asked why don't programmers
>collaborate??
>i don't think i got much of an answer but then 3 years later Rebel-Tiger came
>out:)Anyhow I thank all of you for being nice, i try to be the same way to a
>point.

Some good ideas take some time :)

Ed Schroder

>Thanks



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.