Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:55:40 09/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 1999 at 10:17:11, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On September 30, 1999 at 02:43:32, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On September 29, 1999 at 19:43:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On September 29, 1999 at 19:21:08, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >>> >>>>Doesn't Rebel not use null-move? >>>> >>>>Jeremiah >>> >>> >>>without the contraction: >>> >>> >>>"does not Rebel not use null-move?" >>> >>>Damned if I know, as I can't parse that. :) >>> >>>But I do get your point... :) >>> >>>Bob >> >>:) >>I originally intended to write something along the lines of "I don't think Rebel >>uses null-move." I figured a question would be better, since I wasn't sure, but >>I couldn't figure out how to phrase it correctly. :P >>I revise: "I think Rebel doesn't use null-move. True?" :)) >> >>Jeremiah > >Ed has said here in the past that he doesn't use null-move. > >I think this was distinct from "doesn't use the null-move in the same way as >e.g. Crafty does". > >Dave No idea. Hiarcs doesn't use null-move like I do, but it definitely suffers from problems with the "null-move observation" being used in some way. Ed has said he does some threat extensions... they probably use the "null move observation" as well.. in some fashion...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.