Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 12:02:25 09/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 1999 at 13:33:23, Ed Schröder wrote: >On September 30, 1999 at 12:33:30, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: > >>On September 30, 1999 at 01:58:12, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>>Posted by Joshua Lee on September 29, 1999 at 14:43:02: >>>> >>>>>Some good ideas take some time :) >>>> >>>>Thanks Ed what your doing,having GM's Play your software is just what every >>>>other programmer should do.I would think that someone ought to be able to >>>>make a better list of ratings than the SSDF with your results and if more programmers >>>>follow suit then maybe it's a good idea that the SSDF people find a new >>>>line of work. Human vs computer is more relevant than computer vs computer. >>>>Thanks again very much Mr Shroder >>> >>>No doubt that human vs computer is more relevant than computer vs computer >>>and certainly at 40/120. >>> >>>In the early days of chess when computers played on a 1700 elo level it was >>>a lot easier to conclude which program was the best against humans. >> >> That depends on how early is "early". When Kaissa won the first WCCC, its >>strength was far below 1700 Elo. >>José. > >How true. I remember the fisrt Dutch Championship in 1981. There was a >program (I forgot about the name) that had 2xQ, 2xR, 1xB, 2xN and a >handfull of pawns against a lonely king and couldn't mate the king :) > >Also I was not allowed to participate with Rebel. Reason: lack of strength :) > >Ed Schroder hehehehehehe :-) Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.