Author: blass uri
Date: 13:42:17 09/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 1999 at 12:19:26, Tony Hedlund wrote: > >Strange things happend in round 3. Both programs showed 1-0 to white, but had a >winning evaluation for black!? black had a winning position in game 3 but Hiarcs was black in game 3 I think that the result is now 2.5:1.5 for Junior and not 3.5:.5 You can learn that Junior was black from the analysis of black's moves(only depthes 9-10). Depthes 9-10 are typical to hiarcs and not to Junior. Hiarcs played 3 games in a row with black in games 2-4. I am for Junior but I do not want it to win in an unfair way. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.