Author: Peter Kappler
Date: 10:30:21 10/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 1999 at 10:00:25, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 02, 1999 at 08:00:36, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On October 02, 1999 at 06:24:36, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >> >>>The fastest crafty clone in ICC >>> >>>finger lippy >>>: >>>Statistics for Lippy(C) On for: 3:50 Idle: 0 >>>Lippy is currently involved in a match against EA6PZ(C). >>> >>> rating [need] win loss draw total best >>>Wild 2152 396 45 4 445 2190 (26-May-1997) >>>Bullet 2706 753 22 15 790 2707 (27-Sep-1999) >>>Blitz 2933 1872 110 85 2067 2977 (26-Sep-1999) >>>Standard 2422 80 7 8 95 2422 (02-Oct-1999) >>> >>> 1: Crafty v16.19a (8 cpus) >>> 2: Currently running on a very fast Alpha prototype with 2 CPUs. Two minor >>> bugs in Crafty cause the erroneous "8 cpus" in line 1 above and the erroneous >>> ~400% cpu in whispers. >>> 3: >>> >>> >>>Lippy(C) whispers: ply=12; eval=+3.10; nps=1087K; time=24.27; cpu=398%; egtb=0 >>>aics% >>>Lippy(C) whispers: 27. Bc5 Kc8 28. Rb6 Re8 29. Ba6+ Kd8 30. g4 Nh4 31. Bb7 Kc7 >>>\ 32. Bxa8 Rxa8 33. Rc1 >>> >>>Suprinsingly, it's only at 2933 elo-points >> >>Perhaps it inherited its ratings from playing on a much slower machine. It'll >>take time to build up a bit. >> >>Jeremiah > > >several things... 1. you are right... it started off at 2500-2600. 2. Tim >is running an early 16.20 version (early pawn majority code) that was not all >that great, particularly against computers. 3. I am not sure that lippy is >the 667 21264 all the time, Tim would have to answer that. It is _very_ >strong, hardware-wise... faster with one cpu than my quad xeon... That last statement is tough for me to swallow. A single processor Alpha faster than your quad Xeon? Can you describe this Alpha? I assume a big part of the speedup for Crafty is the 64-bit architecture? --Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.