Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 10:55:54 10/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 1999 at 05:28:21, Micheal Cummings wrote: >Now that Rebel has won Finally agiast a GM which is what I have been waiting for >I have a question, or more of a query really. > >In the past comments have been made that no program is of GM standard and even >if a prgram does win, in some people eyes this means very little in the overall >scheme of programs being better. > >But with this game, even though a win is a win. Did Rebel just clearly out play >the GM or was it a GM stuff up and Rebel was Lucky and took advantage of this >stuff up. Having no idea how this GM plays I wonder from comments made in the >past how far this bring computer chess. > >Was Rebel was in a good chance of winning from the start or was it a case of "I >know we are weaker and hope that the GM stuffs up and we take advantage of this >and win." > >This is just a post to give more opinions, not a swipe at Rebel, I have Rebel >and is one of my two favorite programs and from past posts I have wrote you >should know that I want it to win. This is just me making conversation on an >obsevation that was made in the past. > >Again Congrate's Rebel and Ed and Team. Well in my eyes there is not a single doubt that many computers do have a gm norm but going back to what Robert was talking about yes I still believe the previous GM's just played games against Rebel and new settings give a totaly diferent game.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.