Author: Lanny DiBartolomeo
Date: 11:10:36 10/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 02, 1999 at 19:48:22, Peter Kappler wrote: >On October 02, 1999 at 18:39:12, odell hall wrote: > >>Hi >> >> >> If you add up the Results of all the 40/2 games played in the last year by the >>top programs, including the rebel 10 results, and the games at the wcc99 as well >>as the shredder, Karpov game, you get +2500 easily. Grandmaster strength without >>a doubt, any other conclusions is simply ignoring evidence right in front of >>your eyes. But if you want to just take rebel's results so far, you get the same >>thing over 2500! All the critics are silenced!! > > >Odell, > >I think I see a pattern. > >Every time Rebel loses, you complain that the result can't be taken seriously >because the GM could have been cheating. > >Now that Rebel has finally won a game, you're waving your flag proudly, >pronouncing that Rebel is obviously GM strength. > >It's hard to take you seriously... > >--Peter Hello, The simple fact that GMs have a month to prepare for one game under standard time controls were they are strongest, not blitz mind you, I thought because of this fact alone rebel would be doomed! This is very impressive results for me personally,still need more games of course, but it stays like this seeing that even after this month of preparation (some more than a month) for Rebel to be playing this well still, I never imagined.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.