Author: blass uri
Date: 20:56:16 10/05/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 1999 at 12:29:11, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >On October 05, 1999 at 11:15:35, blass uri wrote: > >>On October 05, 1999 at 10:23:46, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote: >>>Yes,even then, did chaos choose the move against a better move as related to its >>> score,if it saw a move that left its score at +1.00 or the move it made at >>> -1.00 did it go for the -1.00? I think a real sac in a computer is if it >>>chosses a move against its score, or else it is still going on raw calculation. >> >>A serious human does not do sacrifices by your definition. >>Sacrifice is the same as something that you believe that is clearly wrong by >>your definition. >> >>Uri > >Human can make real sacrifice, eg : Kasparov had sacrifice many times one pawn >in early middle game to get an active position or everybody how had white >against Sicilian-Poisoned-Pawn do a sacrifice with 'vague' compensation. Yes, but his evaluation of the sacrifice was better relative to other moves. He evaluated that the active position was more than a pawn. He did not prefer -1 evaluation as better than +1 evaluation and this is what lanny defines as real sacrifice. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.