Author: Eelco de Groot
Date: 07:23:21 10/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 1999 at 10:01:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 06, 1999 at 04:21:31, Eelco de Groot wrote: > >>Robert, Eugene, what does prevent Crafty of adopting the better search of Cray >>Blitz? I understand there are big architectural differences but what do you >>think would be the main factor? >> >>Thanks for any comments, >> >>Eelco >> >> > >Not a thing. IE I have been experimenting with singular extensions (used in >Cray Blitz) off an on. I just haven't found anything that I particularly like >yet... But you can bet that nothing inside cray blitz will be lost, except >for the vectorizabile stuff that will perform very poorly on a PC. But other >search ideas used there will eventually be tried in Crafty... > > Robert , you do an awful lot of your testing on ICC at Blitz-timecontrols. Maybe singular extensions would do better at longer timecontrols? I remember having read that somewhere, that the results were better with deeper searches. Regards,Eelco
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.