Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Nunn test is good!!

Author: Georg v. Zimmermann

Date: 08:53:42 10/06/99

Go up one level in this thread


>
>Why play a match with learning off?  why not ponder=off?  or with the passed
>pawn scoring turned off?  or with the time allocation code turned off?  An
>engine is the sum of its parts.  When you turn off one part, what does that do
>to the validity of the test?

You play program1 against p2 , then
p1 vs. p3 (same starting positions), then
p1 vs. p4
p1 vs. p5

get what i mean ? Learning will help p1 while it doesn't help the other
programs, if you really like testing p1 it will get better and better :-).

Also, he was trying to say something about whether results can reproduced. For
that he has to have the same conditions again of course.

Obviously to say "20 games are enough, i don't care about statistic-theory"
shows that you are kind of , uhm, "special".








This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.